First offense : evidence suggests the offense may have arisen from a temporary panic or from confusion. Column one lists the level. The instructor meets with the student.
When an instructor suspects academic misconduct, he or she should notify the student or students of the alleged academic misconduct within ten 10 working days of learning of the problem. An appeal may be submitted.
Whether or not a hearing is held, only in the most unusual circumstances will the resolution be delayed beyond the subsequent regular term in which the alleged academic misconduct occurred. College provosts, Academic Tribunals, and the Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education VPDUE share discretion for determining disciplinary sanctions including warning, suspension, dismissal, and revocation of degree.
Additional requirements as listed with Warning letter may be imposed. Academic Misconduct Case Workflow.
The case may be reviewed by the Academic Tribunal. If the provost is not certain how to proceed in a specific case, the provost should be in touch with the Council of Provosts Analyst as soon as possible. If the Academic Tribunal finds that the student engaged in academic misconduct, then at a minimum the same disciplinary sanctions will apply as if the student had admitted responsibility during the provost meeting. Records are retained in accordance with University of California policy.
Undergraduate Education. If the student is not affiliated with one of the residential colleges, the Academic Misconduct Form should be submitted to the chair of the Council of Provosts.
More in politics
Only the student not the instructor bringing charges may appeal the decision of the Academic Tribunal. The remaining process determines whether or not a disciplinary sanction will be imposed. If more than one student is alleged to have tly engaged in one or more acts of academic conduct, the Academic Tribunal will make reasonable efforts to hear the cases tly. If such related cases cannot be heard tly, the Academic Tribunal may consider all statements, materials and other evidence presented at the first hearing in any subsequent proceedings or hearings of any other student alleged to have been engaged tly in the same academic misconduct.
Similar rights are extended to faculty members with respect to witnesses and support individuals. A decision is made. Matrix of academic violation levels, definitions and sanctions. Definition and examples.
When the Academic Tribunal determines that a hearing is needed, the hearing will be scheduled to include the instructor and the student. If the disciplinary process in a finding that academic misconduct did not occur, or that it cannot be determined whether or not such occurred, the instructor may initiate a procedural change of grade to reflect the outcome, if they wish to do so.
The instructor meets with the student The college provost meets with the student The case may be reviewed by the Academic Tribunal A hearing may be held A decision is made An appeal may be submitted. If the student agrees that academic misconduct occurred, the provost imposes sanctions guided by the case disposition table, below. Supporting individuals may be asked to leave the hearing at any time.
The student may provide additional written information directly to the tribunal within five 5 working days of the case forwarding to the Analyst for the Council of Provosts. Within five 5 working days of the meeting, and via official UC Santa Cruz addresses, the provost formally notifies the student of the outcome of the case, with copies to the instructor, the chair of the course-sponsoring agency, the Council of Provosts Analyst and the Office of Conduct and Community Standards.
During the meeting between the student and the instructor, if the student persuades the instructor that no academic misconduct occurred, then the matter is closed and no further action is required.
Mobile menu overlay
If the student has any disability-related needs with respect to the hearing, they should be discussed with the Disability Resource Center as soon as the hearing is scheduled, and any resulting request for accommodation should be provided to the chair of the tribunal as soon as possible, always at least ten 10 calendar days prior to the hearing date.
Failure to include this information in the course syllabus, however, does not excuse students from knowing and being able for adherence to the precepts of academic honesty and the policy of the University. If, as a result of an appeal, it is found that a student was improperly found responsible for academic misconduct, the Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education shall ensure that records are adjusted appropriately.
A student considering an appeal may request a copy of tribunal records, including the audio recording of any hearing, up to five 5 working days after the student receives the decision of the Academic Tribunal. This is a ificantly different standard than is used, for example, in criminal cases in an American court of law. In cases involving multiple accused students, the Academic Tribunal may decide to hear the cases separately or tly.
Both the instructor and the accused student are given a chance to speak during the hearing and then members of the Academic Tribunal pose questions as desired. The Academic Tribunal is composed of two or more provosts from colleges other than the college of the student.
The instructor should use the Academic Misconduct Form in the discussion with the student. Each of these stages of the process is described below. This document states campus policy concerning academic misconduct by undergraduates and describes the process that will be followed once an instructor or teaching assistant suspects that misconduct has occurred.
Search form overlay
Students whose graduation is contingent on a finding by an Academic Tribunal will not be eligible to graduate until after the hearing. As with any assessment and regardless of outcome, the student may appeal the grade to the Senate's Academic Assessment Grievance Committee. The accused student and members of the Academic Tribunal should be provided with copies of the relevant evidence at least five 5 working days prior to the scheduled hearing.
One of those provosts will serve as Chair of the Academic Tribunal. In some cases, resolution of alleged academic misconduct during a spring term will not take place until the fall term immediately following.
Such a person may communicate quietly with the accused student but the visitor is not allowed to address the Academic Tribunal members or participate in questioning or testimony. The decision of the Academic Tribunal with respect to verdict and sanctions is final and ends the academic misconduct process, unless the student submits an appeal to the VPDUE. Back to Top The college provost meets with the student On receiving the form, the provost of the college with which the student is affiliated, or the chair of the Council of Provosts in the event that the student is not affiliated with a college, must contact the student to arrange a meeting between the student and the provost.
Warning letter. Misconduct violates the standards of our community and is punishable by warning, suspension, dismissal, or revocation of degree.
Student is warned of consequences of a second offense and may be required to write an apology or a paper, perform community service, attend meetings as part of the probation, or some other option, or combination of options. In this case, dropped classes may be restored, and W grades may be changed to a grade reflecting the academic sanction. Possible findings are that the student engaged or did not engage in academic misconduct, and no finding.
Students may change their pleas at the time of this meeting. Students are responsible for becoming familiar with Sections These sections include a listing of the many types of academic misconduct covered by this policy. The college provost meets with the student.
The cornerstone of intellectual life at UC Santa Cruz is a commitment to integrity in all forms of teaching, learning, and research. The Academic Tribunal will issue its ruling within five 5 working days of the hearing. In cases resulting in suspension or dismissal, the University Registrar is also notified.
All students who are charged with misconduct will be invited to discuss the matter with their instructors and with the provosts of the colleges with which they are affiliated. The Academic Tribunal shall review the materials within ten 10 working days after receipt and shall conclude one of the following:.
If the VPDUE has a conflict related to review of the appeal, the Chancellor will deate an alternate appellate officer. For example, deliberate plagiarism or cheating on an examination may be in this category. Only in very unusual circumstances should as much as an entire term Fall, Winter, Spring pass, subsequent to the term in which the incident allegedly occurred, without notification to the student.
A hearing may be held. After meeting with the student and submitting the form, the instructor ass the course grade in the normal way, taking into the academic sanction. In cases of academic misconduct, the instructor of record has sole discretion to determine academic sanctions e.
Students making such reports may maintain anonymity. The meeting should take place within ten 10 working days of receipt of the form. The provost should also try to determine the circumstances that led to the incident in question. On receiving the form, the provost of the college with which the student is affiliated, or the chair of the Council of Provosts in the event that the student is not affiliated with a college, must contact the student to arrange a meeting between the student and the provost.
It is the responsibility of accused students to invite witnesses if desired, and to ensure their attendance at the scheduled time.
Both students and faculty bear responsibility for preventing academic misconduct. Winter closure, spring break, summer quarter, and other situations may impact completion within the time frames. They are also entitled to bring their cases to the Academic Tribunal.
Students need to avoid academic misconduct themselves and are ened to report any cases of academic misconduct that are known to them. College academic misconduct records will be retained for five 5 years following the academic year in which the case is closed, except in cases resulting in dismissal, in which case records will be retained for 50 years following the academic year in which the case is closed. The time frames expressed within this policy represent the usual case.
Additional requirements as listed with Warning may be imposed.
First offense : evidence suggests that the student or students engaged in sustained or an especially serious violation of academic integrity. Column two lists the definition and examples. No evidence suggests that the student or students engaged in sustained or especially serious violation of academic integrity. Up to five 5 working days prior to the hearing date, the student may inform the Analyst for the Council of Provost of the intent to bring another person e.
Column three stipulates the usual disciplinary action taken. Last modified: January 28, UC Santa Cruz. Failure by the student to respond is taken as prima facie admission of academic misconduct.